8. Nash equilibrium: location, segregation and randomization
This lecture analyzes the Nash equilibrium in the candidate-voter model and explores Schelling's location game to demonstrate how segregation can emerge without individual preference. It further differentiates between centralized and individualized randomization (mixed strategies), exemplified by Rock, Paper, Scissors.
Game Theory (ECON 159)
We first complete our discussion of the candidate-voter model showing, in particular, that, in equilibrium, two candidates cannot be too far apart. Then we play and analyze Schelling's location game. We discuss how segregation can occur in society even if no one desires it. We also learn that seemingly irrelevant details of a model can matter. We consider randomizations first by a central authority (such as in a bussing policy), and then decentralized randomization by the individuals themselves, "mixed strategies." Finally, we look at rock, paper, scissors to see an example of a mixed-strategy equilibrium to a game.
7. Nash equilibrium: shopping, standing and voting on a line
Next · Lecture 9Lecture 9: Mixed Strategies in Theory and Tennis (ECON 159)
Seminar notes & discussion
No public seminar notes on this lecture yet.
