Arguments for the existence of the soul, Part III: Free will and near-death experiences
Professor Kagan critically examines arguments for an immaterial soul, focusing on the incompatibility of free will with determinism and the explanatory challenges posed by near-death experiences. The lecture introduces Descartes's dualist argument for the distinction between mind and body.
Professor Kagan discusses in detail the argument of free will as proof for the existence of an immaterial soul. The argument consists of three premises: 1) We have free will. 2) Nothing subject to determinism has free will. 3) All purely physical systems are subject to determinism. The conclusion drawn from this is that humans are not a purely physical system; but Professor Kagan explains why this argument is not truly compelling. In addition, near-death experiences and the Cartesian argument are discussed at length.
Plato's Phaedo, Theory of Forms & Epistemic Arguments
Next · Lecture 6Arguments for the existence of the soul, Part IV; Plato, Part I
