Skip to content
lectern.tv
1/5

Plato, Part III: Arguments for the immortality of the soul (cont.)

Shelly KaganDistinguishedYale University

Professor

49:54·2008·introductory level

This lecture analyzes Plato's argument from simplicity for the immortality of the soul as presented in the Phaedo. It examines the proposition that the soul, being without parts, is thus indestructible and considers objections raised by Cebes and Simmias regarding this premise.

PhilosophyMetaphysics, Mind & MortalityPlatonic MetaphysicsPhilosophy of MindAncient Greek Philosophy

The lecture focuses exclusively on one argument for the immortality of the soul from Plato's Phaedo, namely, "the argument from simplicity." Plato suggests that in order for something to be destroyed, it must have parts, that is, it must be possible to "take it apart." Arguing that the soul is simple, that it does not have parts, Plato believes that it would logically follow that the soul is indestructible.

Source: YaleCourses via YouTubeWatch on YouTube
LecturerAll lecturers →
Shelly KaganDistinguished

Author of "Death" · Yale University

Shelly Kagan is a Professor of Philosophy at Yale University, widely recognized for his influential work in normative and applied ethics, particularly on the topic of death.

1 course · 22 lecturesCanon
Previous · Lecture 7

Plato, Part II: Arguments for the immortality of the soul

Next · Lecture 9

Plato, Part IV: Arguments for the Immortality of the Soul (cont.)

Comments

Add a comment...Sign in