Skip to content
lectern.tv

Reading Between the Lines, Part 1

Professor

23:35·2026·undergraduate level
Path step 3: Shows how unwritten conventions, structural inference, and historical practice complete written text.

This lecture introduces the method of holistic constitutional interpretation, applying the absurdity canon to the Vice President's impeachment trial and the 'judge in own case' rule. It also examines McCulloch v. Maryland, demonstrating how John Marshall inferred a national bank's legality from the document's overall purpose, not explicit text.

Read literally, the Constitution seems to let the vice president preside at his own impeachment trial. Akhil Reed Amar shows why that cannot be the right answer.

Source: YaleCourses via YouTubeWatch on YouTube

Comments

Add a comment...Sign in