Skip to content
lectern.tv
1

Triage Score: A Counterfactual Risk Assessment Instrument (SIMONS-ECON)

39:56
2

LLM-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mastery Learning: Large-Scale Field Evidence (SIMONS-ECON)

35:06
3

Non-parametric Causal Inference in Dynamic Thresholding Designs (SIMONS-ECON)

30:21
4

Agreement and Alignment for Human-AI Collaborative Decision Making (SIMONS-ECON)

45:21
5

Human Values in Clinical Algorithms, Old and New (SIMONS-ECON)

38:46
6

When Prediction Becomes Policy: What Do Risk Models Actually Learn? (SIMONS-ECON)

33:31
7

Evaluating Probabilistic Decision Making by LLMs: A Decision-Theoretic Framework and Application (SIMONS-ECON)

32:16
8

Algorithmic UDAP (SIMONS-ECON)

32:13
9

Operational Dosage: The Impact of Capacity Constraints on RCT Evaluation (SIMONS-ECON)

35:01
10

The Role of Standardized Tests in Admissions: Predictions vs. Decisions (SIMONS-ECON)

33:37
11

Individual Gaps in Prediction Generalization (SIMONS-ECON)

30:41
12

Beyond Prediction Performance: How Modeling Decisions Shape Fairness Outcomes in Statistical Profiling (SIMONS-ECON)

27:56
13

The Feedback Loop of Statistical Discrimination (SIMONS-ECON)

32:03
14

Decision Theoretic Foundations for Human-AI Collaboration (SIMONS-ECON)

31:01
15

Evaluation Design (SIMONS-ECON)

29:16
16

Recommendation in Equilibrium for the NYC High School Match (SIMONS-ECON)

32:51
17

Automating the US Welfare State: Historical Experiments in Technological Federalism (SIMONS-ECON)

35:41
18

On Machine Learning for Prediction and Prioritization in the Allocation of Scarce Societal Resources (SIMONS-ECON)

35:26

Decision Theoretic Foundations for Human-AI Collaboration (SIMONS-ECON)

Professor

31:01·2026·research level

This session discusses decision-theoretic foundations for human-AI collaboration, presenting measurement frameworks rooted in statistical decision theory and information economics for team performance evaluation.

Jessica Hullman (Northwestern University)

Bridging Prediction and Intervention Problems in Social Systems

Judgments from humans and one or more artificial agents are increasingly combined for decisions, with the expectation that the decisions of the team will outperform those of individual agents. However, simple approaches to providing human decision makers with AI support and evaluating team performance can lead to apparent failures in team performance even when the agents are thought to possess complementary information. I’ll discuss measurement frameworks we’ve developed that apply statistical decision theory and information economics to address questions at the human-agent interface, including how to evaluate when a decision-maker appropriately relies on model predictions, when a human or AI agent could better exploit available contextual information, and how to evaluate (and design) explanations in principled ways.

Comments

Add a comment...Sign in